The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates the figures for telephone calls’ duration in the UK, categorized in 3 different groups, between 1995 and 2002.
As it can be seen from the graph, over the period of 7 years, while the numbers of minutes of calls through mobiles calls as well as national and internal - fixed line experienced an upward trend, the pattern was only true for calls via local-fixed line until 1999, as the reversed trend was observed for the rest of the period. Also, despite the changes, it seems people still spent most time conversing through local-fixed lines in all the 8 years listed.
In 1995, more than 70 billion minutes were spent on local-fixed line, which was followed by less than 40 billion mark for the national and international counterparts. In contrast, the figure for mobile calls’ duration was significantly smaller, at around 3 billion. Over the next 4 years, there was an increase in call time for all 3 categories, with the number for local-fixed line peaking at 90 billion in 1999. Totally, callers spent additionally more than 10 billion minutes on national and international fixed line while mobile calls were still the least popular with only around 15 billion minutes.
However, while the popularity of local-fixed line declined steeply, as evident by the figure of 70 billion minutes in 2002, international and national calls grew to be longer before levelling off after 2001 at 60 billion minutes. The most remarkable rise was witnessed in the mobiles category. The figure rose dramatically before reaching its highest point at 45 billion minutes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mobiles'' or 'mobile's'?
Suggestion: mobiles'; mobile's
...st remarkable rise was witnessed in the mobiles category. The figure rose dramatically ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11832061069 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78743273648 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.292564425 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.1 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142815996379 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670926452793 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472826910596 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10683297064 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397518791902 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.