The given chart presents the data of three types in terms of calling time in Britain in the 1995 - 2002 frame.
All above 70 billions, the local-fixed line has a noticeably higher number of minutes compared to other two categories with the climax point reaching nearly 90 billions. It dropped from 1999 to 2002 while it has increased during the earlier time. Undoubtedly, this kind of telephone call is always ranking first among three varieties, manifesting the preference of residents in the UK.
Additionally, the type of mobiles is the least one. However, its number has dramatically surged with the number of 2002 around 20 times of 1995 . And the national and international-fixed line has steadily increased, keeping a slow but stable pace of increment.
Overall, 1999 was the year that has marked evident and dramatically changes. Local-fixed line takes ranks the first all the way with the trend to climb at the beginning and to began to descend this year, with 70 billions in the end. And the time of call using mobiles keeps an amazing speed to mount up.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e number of 2002 around 20 times of 1995 . And the national and international-fixe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9226519337 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78649949114 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635359116022 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0912388577 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14698147046 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543798156991 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530503238108 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961187271409 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047378126869 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.