Many countries spend a lot of money in the arts. Some people think investment in the arts is necessary, but others say money is better spent on public services and facilities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today's era, art, an increasingly significant sector, is financed forcibly by the government. it is considered that putting more funds into art matters while others hold the view that financing social development is more fundamental. I support the latter because it can directly enhance people’s life.
supporters find that more Economic supports to arts will motivate to more developed arts skills like in paintings and sculptures and more forms of arts expressions such as forms linked to advanced science technology. Though varies individuals hold a variety of views about meaning of beauty, arts undoubtedly, shoulder the duty of spreading the beauty to everyone. people can be bathed in different arts forms, resulting in relaxed emotion and the improvements of cognitive level which means how to realize and enjoy beauty even creat beauty on their own. As to the history, some art works undertake history mission, telling human-being what happened and their unique style in the period. Through these, people will easily find their sense of belongingness to the land while learning about the historical events and styles, and enjoy the goodness from them.
Despite these, public services and facilities may have more impact especially for the poverty and uneducated. Generally, a country whose infrastructures such as sewage systems are poor but developing arts, can't offer a secure life for its citizens and what it will lead to. Obviously, poor living conditions even rebellion will burst if not restricted. Financial support should be put into public services and facilities such as medical care securing individuals' health, social welfare systems function providing aids to poverty even all citizens and building up more shelters for the poor. that's really linked with the human livelihood and national prosperity. To be honest, more improved public services and facilities bring about more strong social cohesion.
In conclusion, investing in radical social care and fundamental infrastructures count more compared to financing art. A healthy growing nation is supposed to satisfy basic requirements of its citizens, and when these are met it is time to support arts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...is financed forcibly by the government. it is considered that putting more funds i...
^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can directly enhance people's life. supporters find that more Economic suppo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Supporters
...ectly enhance people's life. supporters find that more Economic supports to art...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ty of spreading the beauty to everyone. people can be bathed in different arts forms, ...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 207, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e systems are poor but developing arts, cant offer a secure life for its citizens an...
^^^^
Line 11, column 592, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thats
...building up more shelters for the poor. thats really linked with the human livelihood...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 592, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...building up more shelters for the poor. thats really linked with the human livelihood...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, so, while, as for, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49705882353 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83422453587 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620588235294 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6435560541 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12002556516 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401207717421 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0204318911114 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727476487539 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125582925313 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.