Many countries spend a lot of money in the arts. Some people think investment in the arts is necessary, but others say money is better spent on public services and facilities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today's era, art, an increasingly significant social sector, is financed forcedly by the government. it is considered that putting more money into art matters while others hold the view investment in public services and infrastructures is more fundamental. I will talk about both ideas and why I support spend more on public.
More Economic supports to arts will motivate to more developed arts skills like in paintings and sculptures and more forms of arts expressions such as forms linked to advanced science technology. Though varies individuals hold a variety of views about meaning of beauty, arts undoubtedly, shoulder the duty of spreading the beauty to everyone. People can be bathed in different arts forms, resulting in relaxed emotion and the improvements of cognitive level which means how to realize and enjoy beauty even creat beauty on their own. As to the historical meaning, some art works undertake history mission, telling human-being what happened and their unique style in the period. Through these, we will easily find our sense of belonging to the land and be exposed to arts of other cultures, enjoying the goodness from them, and our horizons may be broadened, comparing differences between cultures, bracing them and taking advantages.
However, public services and facilities may have more impact especially for the poverty and uneducated. Please imagine, a country whose infrastructures such as sewage systems are poor but developing arts, can't offer a secure life for its citizens and what it will lead to. Obviously, poor living conditions even rebellion if not restricted. Financial support should be put into public services and facilities such as medical care securing individuals' health, social welfare systems function providing aids to poverty even all citizens and building up more shelters for the poor. That's really linked with the human livelihood and national prosperity. To be honest, more improved public services and facilities bring about more strong social cohesion.
As far as I'm concerned, investing in radical social care and fundamental infrastructures count more compared to financing art. Overall, a healthy growing regime is supposed to satisfy basic requirements of its citizens, and when these are met it is time to support arts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...is financed forcedly by the government. it is considered that putting more money i...
^^
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and why I support spend more on public. More Economic supports to arts will moti...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e systems are poor but developing arts, cant offer a secure life for its citizens an...
^^^^
Line 9, column 580, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...building up more shelters for the poor. Thats really linked with the human livelihood...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 11, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... strong social cohesion. As far as Im concerned, investing in radical social ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, so, while, as for, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40277777778 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85350120655 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5028152439 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5625 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159347476706 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522811441013 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046548534658 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102442915788 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570754166558 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.