The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
(IELTS ACADEMIC 9 - Test 2)
The bar chart illustrates the total quantities of minutes(in billions) of three kinds of telephone calls in the UK from 1995 to 2002. Overall, it is clear that the difference between the three sorts of telephone calls was much smaller in 2002 than in 1995, although local-fixed line was still used most frequently.
In 1995, Local—fixed line was the most popular among the three types, with nearly 72 billion minutes used. It was followed by national and international—fixed line, with about 35 billion minutes spent, and mobiles played the smallest role(only about 3 billion minutes).
Over the period of the seven years, the figure for local—fixed line experienced ups and downs/fluctuations, increasing to a peak at 90 billion minutes in 1999 and then falling back to the 1995 data in 2002. However, the number of minutes used in National and international—fixed line showed a gradual/steady increase, reaching approximately 60 billion minutes by 2002. The same trend can also be seen in that in mobiles, but it increased more significantly after 1998, standing at roughly 40 billion minutes in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...imax point reaching nearly 90 billions. it dropped from 1999 to 2002 while it has ...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e number of 2002 around 20 times of 1995 . And the national and international-fixe...
^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions. And the time of call using mobiles keeps an amazing speed to mount up.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83766233766 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73470774139 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3108397846 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7777777778 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168115499143 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739686056418 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931002096565 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129626913632 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11001278449 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.