The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates that amount of phone calls used by UK citizen that was separated by three different sectors between 1995 and 2002.
Overall,It can be seen that local call i the UK was always top and figure of local calls was identical both start and end of the chart.
According to data , Local call which was fixed line was increased gradually from start of the char till 1999 and this year
it reached at peak on the chart and figured was 90 billions minutes .After that it decreased steadily and finished at around 72 billions minutes in 2002.
The trend for national and international and Mobiles calls was increased their popularity day by day and national and international calls were always higher then Mobiles .Mobile calls started at an insignificant minority of this chart figure was around 2 billions and it continuously increasing and reached at approximately 42 billions minutes whereas national and internationAL call also continued a increasing graph and reached at 60 billions minutes in 2002 and it was was absolutely similar from 2001 .

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , It
... sectors between 1995 and 2002. Overall,It can be seen that local call i the UK wa...
^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...and end of the chart. According to data , Local call which was fixed line was inc...
^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tart of the char till 1999 and this year it reached at peak on the chart and figu...
^^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hart and figured was 90 billions minutes .After that it decreased steadily and fin...
^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...rt and figured was 90 billions minutes .After that it decreased steadily and finished...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as increased their popularity day by day and national and international calls wer...
^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'higher than'?
Suggestion: higher than
...nal and international calls were always higher then Mobiles .Mobile calls started at an ins...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... international calls were always higher then Mobiles .Mobile calls started at an ins...
^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...al calls were always higher then Mobiles .Mobile calls started at an insignificant...
^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Mobile
... calls were always higher then Mobiles .Mobile calls started at an insignificant minor...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creasing and reached at approximately 42 billions minutes whereas national and in...
^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...l and internationAL call also continued a increasing graph and reached at 60 bill...
^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: was
...d at 60 billions minutes in 2002 and it was was absolutely similar from 2001 .
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... 60 billions minutes in 2002 and it was was absolutely similar from 2001 .
^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inutes in 2002 and it was was absolutely similar from 2001 .
^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...it was was absolutely similar from 2001 .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99438202247 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75781157648 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 151.846139233 43.030603864 353% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 222.25 112.824112599 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.5 22.9334400587 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 16.0 1.69756097561 943% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170959114225 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122798606687 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291712873477 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109284236279 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415087355 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.3 13.2329268293 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.28 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.3012195122 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.55 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.