The chart below shows the value of one country's export in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The combination of bar chart and table illustrates the information regarding the income obtained by transporting different products collections during 2015 and 2016 respectively. Generally, the data is calibrated into billions and percentage.
At the first glance, it is clearly witnessed that highest earning was achieved by the petroleum products with 60 billions during 2015, whereas textiles earned lowest amount, accounting for less than 20 billion. More than 50 billion of profit gained by the engineered goods in 2015 and it was raised above 60 billion in 2016. Moreover, agricultural products generated almost equivalent income in both years, comprised of 30 billions.
However, in table, it can evidently be seen that the maximum proportion of textiles was stood up during following period, constituting of 15.24% whilst agricultural products covered minimum percentage of 0.80%. Surprisingly. it is quite surprising to observe that gems and jewellery dropped down to 5.18% which was less demanded. Moving further, nearly 8.5% of engineered goods were exported that ranked second position in the export market.
All in all, it is worthy enough to point out that category like petroleum products and engineered stuff were highly exported and earned more profit. Although, the percentage value of textiles surged as compared to the other, it does not generated much income.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...imum percentage of 0.80%. Surprisingly. it is quite surprising to observe that gem...
^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'generate'
Suggestion: generate
...d as compared to the other, it does not generated much income.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56603773585 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86570482621 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650943396226 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7764898213 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181117158876 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632850808893 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560829187016 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107352698904 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344640069868 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...imum percentage of 0.80%. Surprisingly. it is quite surprising to observe that gem...
^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'generate'
Suggestion: generate
...d as compared to the other, it does not generated much income.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56603773585 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86570482621 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650943396226 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7764898213 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181117158876 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632850808893 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560829187016 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107352698904 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344640069868 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.