The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the man features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart indicates the number of one particular nation's exports in a variety of categories during the period 2015 and 2016. Also, the other table highlights the changes in the exports.
Overall, It can be seen that there are a total of five products such as Textile, Agricultural, Jewellery, Engineered, Petroleum.
First of all, Petroleum products are the most-sold products overall with a turnover of 61 billion dollars in 2015. Further, the sales have seen a growth of 3%, and the revenue collected in the year 2016 was $64 billion. At the same time, Engineered goods stand out at a second-place with little less than $60 billion sales in the previous year. But, In 2016 the same has went up by 8.5%, beating the latter item. Secondly, Jems and Jewellery are also one of the major selling products with 43 billion dollar market in the year 2015, Whereas, In these case, the data shows that overall sales have gone down in 2016 by 5.18%.
On the other hand, a significant profit can be observed in the Textile market where the sales in 2015 were just 25 billion dollars, and the same has gone up supremely by 15.24% in 2016 with more than $35 billion. In opposite, the least sold item is the Agricultural products with numbers same as the latter product in 2015 and the former year was also not that good only 0.81% growth can be seen.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'totals'?
Suggestion: totals
...verall, It can be seen that there are a total of five products such as Textile, Agric...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[6]
Message: Note: went is a past participle of "wend". Did you mean 'gone' (past participle of "go")?
Suggestion: gone
...revious year. But, In 2016 the same has went up by 8.5%, beating the latter item. Se...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65546218487 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44403497721 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567226890756 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.578651623 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204156860923 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889849682399 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905317722421 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137633075423 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11994961982 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'totals'?
Suggestion: totals
...verall, It can be seen that there are a total of five products such as Textile, Agric...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[6]
Message: Note: went is a past participle of "wend". Did you mean 'gone' (past participle of "go")?
Suggestion: gone
...revious year. But, In 2016 the same has went up by 8.5%, beating the latter item. Se...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65546218487 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44403497721 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567226890756 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.578651623 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204156860923 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889849682399 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905317722421 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137633075423 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11994961982 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.