The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared to 2105.
Given are two figures concerning the exports of one particular country. The first figure is a line graph illustrating the amount of money that this country earns from exporting goods and materials in different categories in two consecutive years. While the second one is a table that compares these values by means of percentage.
A glance at the first figure shows that this country benefited more in exporting petroleum products as well as engineered goods in both years with nearly 60 billions of dollars earning in each year for each category. In contrast only near 30 billion dollars was earned from textile and agricultural products exportation.
According to the table we can state that export earnings from textiles had increased almost 15% from 2015 to 2016 which is by far the most increase percentage in all categories. Engineering goods and petroleum products with respectively 8.5 and 3 percentage change are in the second and third place.
Also note worthily is the fact that gems and jwellery is the only category that showed a decrease in percentage change in values. While country earned more than 40 billion dollars in 2015 from exporting jwellery, this amount had decline to nearly 40 billion dollars in 2016 which means it had a 5.2% decrease in only one year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nt categories in two consecutive years. While the second one is a table that compares...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es these values by means of percentage. A glance at the first figure shows that ...
^^^
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '60 billion'.
Suggestion: 60 billion
...ineered goods in both years with nearly 60 billions of dollars earning in each year for each c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ning in each year for each category. In contrast only near 30 billion dollars was earned...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...as earned from textile and agricultural products exportation. According to the table we...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nge are in the second and third place. Also note worthily is the fact that gems and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, third, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00934579439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66145186969 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560747663551 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.767019821 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282606533991 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112854384434 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505679797126 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167887674183 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455738960512 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.