The charts below the proportion of different types of vehicle using a major bridge in the UK in 1965,1985 and 2005. Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are three pie charts, depicts information about the amount of various types of cars passing through a bridge in United Kingdom in three different years with an interval of 20 years.
A glance at these charts illustrates that, private cars were mostly used by British people in all these years. We can also mention that, the percentage of private cars passed through the bridge got increased from 47% in 1965 to 74% in 2005.In contrast, recreational vehicles like motor homes contain only less than 10% of vehicles using this bridge in provided years.
It is also interesting to note that the percentage of public transport vehicles which was almost 30% in 1965 declined to almost 15% in 1985 and continued reducing to only 5% in 2005, which means people tend to use their own cars instead of using public transportation.
Trucks, lorries and other commercial vehicles contain 20% of vehicles which crossed the bridge in 1965. This number was almost 5% higher in 1985, but in 2005 only 12% of crossing cars was lorries and commercial vehicles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are three pie charts, depicts information a...
^^^
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...creased from 47% in 1965 to 74% in 2005.In contrast, recreational vehicles like mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92134831461 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50312265528 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623595505618 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5897627606 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185212732456 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896528981572 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302837201103 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106475010467 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00631029896745 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.