The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main

The diagrams illustrates the number of earnings from variety of exported products of a country in 2015 and 2016 and the alternative percentage of each category in one year. Overall, petroleum products is the most profitable exports and most of the products had an upward trend in the period from 2015 to 2016.
As it can be seen from the bar chart, the income from petroleum products makes up the largest earnings of the country with the total value of over 120 billion dollars in 2 years, which is approximately twice as much as that of textiles, which has the least value among exported goods. Meanwhile, engineered goods brought the second value of earnings, of which total income is appropriately 120 billions, followed by gem and jewelry and agricultural goods respectively,
From the data of the table, the period from 2015 to 2016 witnessed the biggest jump in the values of exported textiles, growing about 15.24%, while agricultural products had the least increase, about 0.81%. Especially, the only product with a decreased value in the period is gems and jewelry with 5.18% downward.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The diagrams illustrates the number of earnings from variety of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99453551913 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7249739438 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535519125683 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.51663376 43.030603864 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 182.8 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6 22.9334400587 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22935554902 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143550856362 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882709484159 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163669732095 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078081778124 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.2329268293 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.