The graphs compare the money coming from exports and percentage change between 2015 and 2016 in a single country.
Overall, most of the earnings were from oil cruds and petroleum products. It can be also seen that all categories increased between 2015 and 2016, except gems and jewellery that had shown a slight drop in value.
To start with petrol based goods and engineered products, which were the top two money sources, both had nearly the same proportion. Moreover, petroleum products rose by 3% from $60 billion in 2015 to $62 billion in 2016. While engineered goods soared up by a significantaly higher rate of 8.5% reaching around $62 billion in 2016.
However, the tree remaining classifactions made much lower earnings. Precious stones and jewellery registered the only drop among the other four categories of around 5.18%. On one hand, textiles recorded a 15.24% rise from $25 billion to over $30 billion, which was the highest increase in the table. On the other hand, the slightest increase of 0.81% was for farming products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graphs compare the money coming from...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en 2015 and 2016 in a single country. Overall, most of the earnings were from ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat had shown a slight drop in value. To start with petrol based goods and eng...
^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...0 billion in 2015 to 2 billion in 2016. While engineered goods soared up by a signifi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5% reaching around 2 billion in 2016. However, the tree remaining classifactio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, as for, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96531791908 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63059767056 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647398843931 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8922581603 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.9 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188724213093 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696247133015 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858497365439 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133225340647 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918118390197 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.