As more and more factories and industries are being founded, many governments around the world came up with the solution of letting those foundations transfer from urban to rural areas. According to me, this has myriads of merits which simply outweigh the demrits.
Initially, there are immense benefits of moving factories outside big cities. One main reason is that this allows more houses, hotels and other residential compounds to be built in cities. With further explanation, if all business buildings and companies changed their sites to rural zones, more and more space would be available and provided for real estate and residential constructions. In addition, this measurement would definitely mean reducing smoke and gas emissions coming out of factories. This problem has been facing humanity since time immemorial, and this solution will not only decrease respiratory diseases, but also air pollution rates as well as traffic jam in cities.
Moving to the cons, there are many that are worth taking into consideration. Firstly, transportation is essential but could be quite expensive, which could possibly lead to either the must for governments to provide free public transportation, or companies will have to raise salaries. Another drawback is that there can be long and dangerous roads which workers have to take on the way to work. Moreover, those employees have families and children to take care of, and if an urgent situation occurs back at home, therefore they won't be able to arrive on time.
To sum up, the approach of moving industries and businesses to areas away from cities seems very beneficial, but, however, there is a list of problems that require to be fixed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...ons transfer from urban to rural areas. According to me, this has myriads of merits which simpl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ial but could be quite expensive, which could possibly lead to either the must for governments...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of problems that require to be fixed.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19708029197 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76861804592 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656934306569 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1321913029 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147213635185 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542135905634 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483188395783 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093017901417 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452633433294 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.