The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in
each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart and table compare the change in percentage of the monetary values of exporting products between 2015 and 2016.
Overall, it is obvious that petroleum and engineered goods covered the majority in the exporting field. In contrast, the textile clearly was the minority in overseas trading areas. However, the textiles, itself, showed the largest increase in the amount of selling.
In 2015, Petrol Chemistry items and manufactured products stood out from the rest. Petrol value was approximately 61 billion and slightly raised to around 63 billion in 2016. Engineered products worthed nearly 570000000 dollars and increased moderately to above 60 billions in a year. Clothing fabric, the least popular in all categories, followed a similar trend with a dramatic increase at 15.24% rate.
On the contrary, the other two categories experienced a gradual decrease in the number of sales. Decorating jewelry demonstrated a 5.18% drop in value from 2015 to 2016, while the percentage change of farming and agricultural tools showed a slight drop at 0.81%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77947833369 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650887573964 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5470154813 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272553727224 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876591755753 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105051902543 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175390168443 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121048452174 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.