The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The bar chart compares five categories of exporting earnings in one country in 2015 and 2016, and the table demonstrates changes over a one-year period for each item in percentage.
It is clear that the sales of the products increased for four out of five categories, and petroleum products contributed the biggest incomes for the country’s earnings for both 2015 and 2016. We can see that even though the incomes from textiles kept at a small number comparing to those from others, it rose by the biggest percentage.
According to the bar chart, the amount of money coming from petroleum products rose from 60 billion in 2015 to about 62 billion dollars in 2016, ranked the most popular exporting goods. Earnings from engineered goods, agricultural products and textiles showed an increasing trend too, from 58 to 60, 31 to 32, and 25 to 33 billion dollars respectively. Gems and jewellery, however, became less popular over the period from 2015 to 2016, with a fall from 43 to 41 billion dollars.
Looking at the percentage change in the table, we can see the most significant fluctuation was in the textiles industry, demonstrating an increase of 15.24% compared the sales from 2015 to 2016. The changes for turnover in the percentage of engineered goods and gems and jewellery were both over 5%, 8.5% more for the former and 5.18% less for the later. Products from petroleum and agriculture contributed more stable in incomes from overseas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'textiles'' or 'textile's'?
Suggestion: textiles'; textile's
...most significant fluctuation was in the textiles industry, demonstrating an increase of ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74213684335 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510288065844 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.981850602 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244666604488 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110682591491 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120140613884 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185952680386 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137231215857 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.