The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The bar graph illustrates the details about different transportation of goods done by one nation and earnings are shown in billion dollars, while the table depicts the proportion change in numbers of five different products. The data is given for the year 2015 and 2016.
Overall, in exports both, petroleum goods and engineered products were major, whereas diamonds and jewels were moderate. However, agricultural goods and textiles were minor in transportation.
In 2015, exports of petroleum stocks was 61 billion dollars, after a year there was increase of (3%) and it rose to almost 63 billion dollars, while engineered goods in 2016, were around 62 billion dollars (8.5%) increased as compared to the year 2015, it was roughly 58 billions. However, transport of diamonds and jewels was more in 2015 it was almost 43 billions, whereas in 2016 it was less 41 billion dollars exports decreased by (5.18%).
In 2016, there was slight increase (0.81%) in exports of agricultural goods it was around 33 billions and in 2015 it was roughly around 32 billions. However, there was huge increase in transport of textiles goods in 2016 as compared to previous year 32 and 17 billion dollars respectively. Increase of (15.24%) as compared to 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...by one nation and earnings are shown in billion dollars, while the table depicts the pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... textiles were minor in transportation. In 2015, exports of petroleum stocks was...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10294117647 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75011359033 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480392156863 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.7857846134 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174402979374 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927232651554 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499565040845 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111306450149 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453507038879 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.