The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste
that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002.
The bar graph depicts the proportions of various kinds of household throw away that were (Plastic, Cans, Paper, Glass) reused in one particular urban area between 10 years starting from 1992 to 2002.
Overall, paper and glass are most recycled in the given data, whereas plastic and cans are the least recycled.
In 1992, plastic is the least recycled as it was 10%, whereas cans are more reused as compared to other wastes products it was about 18%. However, in this year the recycling percentage was same for both paper and glass it was about 15%. In 1997, recycling of plastic was around 13% and for cans it was slightly more in contrast with plastic it was roughly 14%. In this year the paper was recycled more than other waste products it was just over 30%, however recycling for glass was slightly less than paper it was almost 28%
In 2002, the plastic recycled was same as compared to the year 1997 it was 13%, but there was moderate increase in recycling of cans it was just less than ¼. Likewise, with paper there was significant increase it was just 1% less for 40%. Furthermore, glass was most recycled in the year 2002 as compared to the other waste products as well as all the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ly less than paper it was almost 28% In 2002, the plastic recycled was same as ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, likewise, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 7.0 329% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65740740741 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20461776872 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462962962963 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.0623681433 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130813755798 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762110786985 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537132749623 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970468668579 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524685085076 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.