The chart illustrates the proportion of various types of domestic waste, which were recycled in a particular city from 1992 to 2002.
Overall, there was an increasing amount of domestic waste recycled on 4 types of waste. The amount of glass waste recycled was the highest, whereas plastic was recycled the least. But glass waste recycled, which changed more dramatically.
In 1992, The proportion of glass, which was recycled, accounted for 14%, then it increased significantly to nearly 30% in 1997. In the next 5 years, the figure grew considerably to approximately 50%, which was the most recycled waste material in 2002. Similarly, the percentage of paper represented 14% in 1992 and climbed dramatically to about 40% in 2002.
When it comes to cans, the figure stood at nearly 20% in 1992, which was the highest type of household waste recycled in 1992. Subsequently, it declined slightly to over 10% in 1997 before rising substantially to 25% in 2002. By contrast, the percentage of plastic constituted approximately 10% in 1992, then it increased insignificantly to 13% in 1997 and stayed stable until 2002.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14754098361 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01885739233 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.600939833 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280033668288 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118321754656 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735595655061 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19105430609 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058719616214 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.