Nowadays, car owners have gone up dramatically in some countries. I firmly believe that the demerits of this trend brings exceed its merits.
On the one hand, there is an advantage for people who own their own car. To begin with, a personal vehicle allow people flexibility in commuting. To be more specific, it reduces the people's reliance on public transports and shared vehicles, which is time-taking for people who do not have their own vehicle. For example, if a person owns a personal car, they will not to stop for waiting buses or depend on shared mobility. As a result, the travel time greatly reduces and people tend to be more punctual.
However, I believe the positive aspects of this trend are eclipsed by more immediate threats to life by purchasing more and more cars. One detrimental problem, the increasing number of cars has contributed harmfully to the environment. In more detail, the more cars being purchased, the more emission emits by cars into the environment. According to a recent study, global emissions have been increased by 20%, since the increasing number of cars in the world. As a consequence, it results in the melting of ice caps and oceans. Another negative aspect is that human health can be affected by the increasing amount of car exhaust gases. In other words, car exhaust gases emit from fossil fuel cars, which cause many diseases by inhaling these gases. A recent study shows that people, who suffer from chronic lung disease, have climbed by 30% because daily exposure to gases, which emits from cars. Therefore, purchasing more vehicles can impact on health of people.
In conclusion, the demerits of this trend are clearly more significant. I believe that purchasing more personal cars may not only influence detrimentally on the ecosystem but also affect negatively people's health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ng. To be more specific, it reduces the peoples reliance on public transports and share...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02950819672 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67040273981 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580327868852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3301280358 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2222222222 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283975248584 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088006967946 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075214310544 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153004877897 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880517784101 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.