Many people claim that undeveloped nations should be helped by developed nations. I totally agree with this statement because of two main reasons which are properous countries are well-equipped with resources and technology to survive from natural disasters, also, helping countries in time of catastrophe can increase their international relations.
To begin with, developed countries should aid undeveloped nations financially in surviving from natural disasters. In more detail, they own advanced equipment and technology which help them to forecast and alleviate the worst situations. Along with, they have a surplus a necessities like canned food and drinkable water for coping with calamities. According to a newspaper, USAID, which is the US philanthropic organization, responds to an avarage of 65 disasters in more than 50 countries every year and provide a huge number of advanced technology and fundamental needs for countries affected by calamities.
Another point to consider that aiding poorer countries can strengthen their relations. To be more specific, providing support to underprivileged nations, prosperous nations can gain belief from undeveloped or developing goverment. Therefore, it is beneficial to them in establishing close international cooperation. For example, Japan has been aiding to Vietnam a great deal of humanitarian aid whenever Vietnam experiences a disaster. As a result, many million-dollar Japanese projects have been approved to construct infrastructure in Vietnam without objection.
In conclusion, affluent nations should support poorer countries because rich countries not only own a vast amount of advanced technology and resources but also they can develop their international relations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96015936255 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28324563648 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613545816733 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6969674085 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233782993121 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834771501401 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073672097244 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150421909768 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444752643323 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.