The maps illustrate the changes of a bookstore that have taken place in 2000 and now.
Overall, the bookstore has experienced a process of development, resizing and relocation of some sections. It is worth to note that the bookstore has undergone significant changes with more facilities.
When it comes to the bookstore in 2000, the bookstore was the square-shaped building with its entrance at the west. The service desk was placed on the left bottom corner of the building while travel and newbooks section was situated at the front of the entrance. The fiction section was divided into 2 segments, which took up significant space, one along the top and the other along the right upper corner. The non-fiction books was arranged to south, towards the east of the service desk. At the center, there were rows of books on art, hobbies and cookery.
The first change happen is the shrunken by a quarter of the previous fiction area. Books on art , hobbies and cookery account for other three parts. The non-fiction book section is moved to the right upper corner, where fiction book took up in 2000, and given away to a cafe. Subsequently, the middle area is cleared to make space for a seating area. However, the new books section, service desk and travel stay remained the same original places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the other along the right upper corner. The non-fiction books was arranged to south...
^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the previous fiction area. Books on art , hobbies and cookery account for other t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87837837838 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55637634658 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563063063063 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9188537989 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3076923077 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.23076923077 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0917776303646 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350831922554 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399589987812 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648171799098 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508223457202 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.