The maps below show a book store in 2000 and now.
Summarise the main information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrate changes done to the layout of a book store between 2000 and present time.
Overall, it is evident that space for reading materials has been reallocated, with a clear reduction in that for fiction. The store has also been equipped with a new seating area and a new café.
In 2000, sections for travel and new books were placed immediately at the front while the service desk was situated to the right of the entrance. Fiction took up significant space, being displayed on 2 sections, one along the top and the other along right-handed corner. Aisles for books about cookery, hobbies and art were notably smaller and arranged in the middle of the store whereas a section for non-fiction works was placed nearby.
At the present, new books and books for travel as well as the service desk are still kept at their original places. Fiction, however, is given less space as it now is sharing an aisle with reading materials for art, hobbies and cookery in the aisle opposite travel reading. This also freed up the middle section for a new seating area, with tables and chairs. Another notable change is that non-fiction has been relocated to the area that used to display fictional reading, to the back of the store, which meant a new café could be built in its place.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76651982379 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36147181386 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568281938326 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6308854788 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.2 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0790065025833 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391001250952 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425689922861 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681321774786 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492381156279 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.