The maps illustrate the changes that took place at a university department on the ground floor plan in 2 different years of 2000 and 2015.
Overall, the university department experienced a process of modernization, turning the area into a modernized area with more facilities but fewer greenery. It is worth to note that the changes in the North-east more significant than in the South-West.
In 2000, there was a big main entrance leading to the building. There were 3 seminar rooms, the first and second rooms were on the left side of the corridor and the other one was on the other side. The library was situated between the third seminar room and an office. Finally, there was a park lying to the east.
In 2015, the building was extended to the north, the number of seminar rooms increased to 5 rooms as 2 more rooms took place in the north of the building. Subsequently, the office was widened, which took place of the old library. The next change was that the park was demolished, which aimed to build a new library and a new IT center. The university department saw a new car park built below the office. Also, the main entrance and the street stayed unchanged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
...med to build a new library and a new IT center. The university department saw a new ca...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6875 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63433024145 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0747619822 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.25 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223478385558 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822765239777 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148826508838 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188402538786 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.209502744764 0.0819641961636 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.