It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree

Many people claim that all people in the world cannot be assisted, so governments should help their citizens before others. I totally agree with this statement because the purpose of any governments is their own society's sakes and the government cannot tackle issues in the world.

There are several reasons that aiding their own country is advantageous. Firstly, the most crucial purpose of most governments to put their own society's sakes first. To be more specific, the government can develop their country by prioritizing their nation. To illustrate, the authorities collect taxes from their citizen, then the tax collected is used for betterment of the economy, such as building infrastructures, enhancing education and healthcare facilities. It seems that the country's economy would be enhanced significantly if the government prioritize their society.

Another point to consider that the government is unable handle a great number of problems around the world. In more detail, there are a large number of people, who are seeking for rescue in the world. Therefore, it would be efficient if the government focus on their citizens in their own country. For example, the covid-19 pandemic has exacerbated several countries' economy. As a result, countries have to issue their own policy to protect their citizens from being infectious in order to solve the problem before aiding other countries.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the merits of focusing on own country are more beneficial. I will not only improve the country's economy but also more efficient to alleviate other countries' problems.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nd the world. In more detail, there are a large number of people, who are seeking for rescue in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...vid-19 pandemic has exacerbated several countries economy. As a result, countries have to...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35039370079 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84013303081 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1528077776 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338698786536 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121449747286 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838544447614 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212104541126 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891733799506 0.056905535591 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.