The spread of multinational companies and the resulting increase of globalization produce positive effects to everyone Do you agree or disagree

Many people claim that the expansion of multinational corporations and globalization generate more benefits to people. I firmly agree with this assertion because the increasing of multinational organizations and globalization provide local employment and allow people to purchase foreign products at lower prices.

The expansion of transnational companies and globalization can be deemed advantageous for some reasons. To begin with, multinational corporations can reduce local unemployment rates. To be more specific, multinationals provide thousands of jobs for local place where they come in, and shift the standard of local living by offering high incomes. For example, Samsung factories, which are located in Vietnam, have reduced the unemployment rates in Vietnam by 20% and boost Vietnam's standards of living dramatically by providing higher incomes than average. It seems that transnational organizations provide great opportunities for local people.

Another point to consider that globalization allows people to access to overseas products at inexpensive prices. In more detail, globalization enables goods to be produced in different parts of the world, which provide lower average costs for consumers. For example, thanks to the globalization, Indian people can buy Apple's products at cheaper prices, since Apple factories are situated in Indian without being levied high taxes. As a consequence, globalization allows people to purchase affordable and foreign products.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the merits of the expansion of multinationals and globalization are more beneficial to everyone. It will not only diminish the local non-employment rates but also provide overseas and low-priced products.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.928 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33970058538 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6057680923 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117371141053 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493906058847 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419338315142 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813902530557 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411259911102 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.