Education of young people is highly prioritised in many countries However educating adults who cannot read and write is even more important and government spent more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree

Many people claim that governments should invest in education to eliminate illiteracy among adults. I strongly agree with this assertion because literacy improves the economy and health.

Prioritizing education among illiterate adults can be deemed as advantageous for some reasons. To begin with, literacy can lead to economic development. To be more specific, effective literacy skills open the doors to more educational and employment opportunities that allows people to escape from poverty and chronic underemployment. It is essential to expand their knowledge in order to keep up with pace of change in our rapidly changing technological world. For example, the economy of Vietnam has increased dramatically over the last decades since Vietnamese government has invested and prioritized in terminating illiteracy among adults people. Therefore, literacy plays a crucial role in economic enhancements.

Another positive aspect to consider is that educating adults who are illiterate can enhance human well-being. In other words, people with adequate literacy skills tend to participate and contribute greatly to communities. A recent study shows that people who attended a literacy program are more likely to seek for medical help for themselves and their communities when needed. They are inclined to adopt more preventative health measures. Moreover, literate patients also have an easier time to follow instructions from their doctors. Thus, literacy is one of the key tools in keeping communities safe and healthy.

In conclusion, terminating illiteracy amongst adults is beneficial. Literate adults will not only lead to economic developments in some countries but also enhance significantly community well-being.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84584980237 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10598005867 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3271534693 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4375 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181632507257 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552494496 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517353477763 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113516029772 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035141101536 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.35 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.