Many people claim that processed food and drink products impact harmfully on people's health. Thus, it is suggested that government should impose higher prices on products which contain high level of sugar to prevent people from consuming excessively sugar. I totally agree with this statement because imposing higher prices on these products could help people to avoid health problems and change consumer behavior.
To begin with, levying higher prices on products highest in sugar could prevent consumers from diseases. To be more specific, consuming sugary products in a long time could lead to many chronic diseases such as obesity and heart disease. For example, 50% of American adults are obese due to consuming excessively a huge amount of sugary products and has been major problem that the US population are coping with. As a result, If the prices of processed food and drink products were not reduced, chronic diseases would increase significantly.
Furthermore, taxing higher costs on sugary products could change behavior of consumers in purchasing foods with highest in sugar. In more detail, by charging higher costs on sugary products, people would tend to purchase wholesome products that it is beneficial for their health. A recent study showed that the number of Japanese people who are obese has reduced dramatically to 5% of the population by imposing high taxes on sugar-containing products and most Japanese people prefer wholesome food to sugary goods. Consequently, by raising the prices of sugary products, customers would be encouraged to change their purchases and buy inexpensive food which might be healthier.
In conclusion sugar-containing food and drink products could contribute greatly to many health problems. Raising costs of sugary products not only curb people from chronic disease but also change consumer behavior.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46875 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73510406947 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9251601976 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.153846154 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44328582805 0.244688304435 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183485241558 0.084324248473 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748716316368 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309026958369 0.151304729494 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564058864787 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.