Nowadays, as countries around the world continue to develop, the demand for oil and gas has increased, and finding in distant natural places is a way to meet the demand. I firmly believe that the demerits of this trend brings exceed its merits.
On the one hand, there is a benefit to look for sources of material in faraway lands. To begin with, it can improve people's living standards. To be more specific, in many countries, fuels such as gas and oil allow people to use their fossil fuel vehicles and the production of goods. A recent study shows that fuels such as oil and gas are becoming exhausted, which results in the operation of factories, companies and the running of fossil fuels cars. It seems that the shortage of fuels are impacting on the life quality of people and seeking materials in remote natural places is the best way to enhance standards of living.
However, I believe that the positive aspects of this trend are eclipsed by more immediate threats to the ecosystem. One detrimental problem is that the balance of the environment will be jeopardized by the searching of fuels in untouched natural places. In other words, natural resources exploration damage greatly to the destruction of the ecosystem and contribute harmfully to natural disasters. According to a research, natural disasters have increased 20% such as flood, soil erosion and landscape degradation, due to resources exploitation. As a result, it can push people and many animals into the brink of collapse. Another negative aspect is that people's health can be affected by the use of fossil fuels. In more detail, the use of fossil fuels on a wide-scale has led to the pollution of cities. According to a renowned news, carbon dioxide emits into the atmosphere by the use of gas-consuming vehicles. Therefore, the environment is affected by emissions from the consumption of gas and oil, which influences harmfully health of people.
In conclusion, the demerits of this trend are clearly more significant. I believe searching for energy such as oil and gas in distant natural places will not only affect the ecosystem but also impact detrimentally on people's health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...natural places. In other words, natural resources exploration damage greatly to the destr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l not only affect the ecosystem but also impact detrimentally on peoples health.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0027700831 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79823095082 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504155124654 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4500490365 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315159140477 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843973802023 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798806429725 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20185289581 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450794902444 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.