the chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 the table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compaired with 2015
The bar graph compares the income of one country through exporting products that is broken down into five categories in the year 2015 and 2016. In addition, the date from the table illustrates the fluctuation of each category at percentages.
Overall, it is clear that petroleum products and engineered goods are made up of the most significant part in this export earnings. Both of them suffer an upward trend over this period.
Begin in 2015 with petroleum products which brought the highest income in this economy with over 60 billion USD. Engineered products hold the second place with 55 billion USD, however it achieved a huge development in just one year later by increasing 8.5% while the petroleum field rose gradually by 3%. Therefore, in 2016, their earning is not so different in discrepancy.
Next are the agricultural products and the textiles earned about 30 billion USD and 25 billion USD, respectively. However, while the farming income rose gradually by 0.81%, the textiles income dramatically gained more 15.24%. And in 2016, these two reached the equal number at over 30 billion USD. Despite all of this increase, gems and jewelry dropped from nearly 45 billion USD to 40 billion USD over this period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'textiles'' or 'textile's'?
Suggestion: textiles'; textile's
...ing income rose gradually by 0.81%, the textiles income dramatically gained more 15.24%....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07389162562 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63080938106 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610837438424 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6477536998 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6363636364 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149111493447 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633867482994 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763569902645 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113236914076 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110792335759 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.