The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015
Given is a bar chart illustrates the tons of waste was recorded by a recycling center such as paper, glass, tins and garden during 5 years from 2011 to 2015.
It is clear that the total amount of waste collected each year followed similar trend and fluctuated slightly. Additionally, while paper waste was the most collected in the type of recyclable waste, the opposite was true for that of garden during the period.
In 2011, paper was the highest type of waste, as just around 57 tons, while 50 tons of glass was collected. Meanwhile, there were approximately 35 tons of tin collected, and 32 tons of plastic waste.
The amount of paper accounted for the lowest point of approximately 40 tons in 2013 before increasing to over 70 tons in 2015, which reached a peak of 5 years. Meanwhile, the figures for other types of waste all witnessed fluctuation throughout the period, with 52 tons of glass, 39 tons of tin and 35 tons of garden waste collected in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new houses Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas Do the advantages 73
- The diagram shows the process for canning pears Write a report of at least 150 words summarizing the main details and making comparisons where relevant 47
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The table below gives information on average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61657842963 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8406040334 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2177982042 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109991329292 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104518313168 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157762148419 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115360159105 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.