The chart below shows what anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years
The pie chart compares the paths Anthropology graduates chose after their graduation and the table illustrates the comparision of their salaries after five years work experience.
Generally speaking, more than half of the students turn toward full-time work after finishing their course while the least prefer to pursue higher studies with a part-time job. By contrast, maximum number of graduates working on a government sector and freelance consultant has a salary figure of 100000+ plus dollars.
With regard to the pie chart, after finishing their course, about 52% of student devour to full-time work, followed by part-time work which has the second highest proportion. If we compare this figures with unemployed pupils, there is merely a gap of three precentage(almost 12%). Certainly, personel prefer to participate in full-time study show equaly number as students with no data. People concentrating towards part-time work and higher studies(about 5%) are 10 times less than those committed to full employment.
Turning to the presented table, the percentages of employees working in freelance consultants and government sectors exhibits a similar numbers when the salary remains between 25000-74999 dollars. In terms of 75000-99999 dollars and 100000 plus dollars margine both demonstrates a 10% gap. Most of the employees working in private vendors have a income between 50000-74999 dollars(about 35%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ployees working in private vendors have a income between 50000-74999 dollarsabout...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64788732394 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95622585548 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657276995305 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9437410125 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.3 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239398965073 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910098468803 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113774309811 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175790493068 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136084326214 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.