This report represents two line charts delineating the comparison of three electrical appliances onwership and their hours of usage in household chores per week in each residence from 1920 to 2019.
Generally speaking, the accommodations containing fridge and a vacuum cleaners incresed in the definate period. By contrast, the trend of having a washing machine remained constant after a gradual rise in the first three years.
In the first line chart, In 1920, washing machines were the most common appliance in accommodations followed by vacuum cleaner. Both were approximately at 40% and 30% respectively. Although, fridge was not properly available in houses in the starting year, its figure exhibited a significant growth in the following years to reach a peak of aroud 100% in 1980. Moreover, the figure for cleaners also demonstrated a constant rise and overtook the proportion of washing machines in 1960 and rose to highest point at 2000. Despite exhibiting a gentle growth in the opening three years of the graph the number of housholds having a washing machine remained below 80% in the next 59 years.
Turning towards the second line graph, in 1920, the units of domestic work per week peaked at 50%. This trend saw a drastic decline in numbers till 1980 and stayed under 20% in the remaining period of the definite time.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...on of washing machines in 1960 and rose to highest point at 2000. Despite exhibiting a gen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n numbers till 1980 and stayed under 20% in the remaining period of the definite ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10454545455 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76705455477 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7008599418 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0976542072625 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358193120432 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526889088555 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0644147498099 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612580707684 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...on of washing machines in 1960 and rose to highest point at 2000. Despite exhibiting a gen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n numbers till 1980 and stayed under 20% in the remaining period of the definite ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10454545455 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76705455477 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7008599418 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0976542072625 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358193120432 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526889088555 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0644147498099 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612580707684 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.