he charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
The first line chart compares the proportion of residence containing three particular appliances from 1920 to 2019 and the second one describes the hours of household work per week in that time in each homes.
Generally speaking, the accommodations containing refrigerator and vaccum cleaner incresed in the given period while the digit of households having a washing machine remained constant after a gentle increrase in the first three years.
Turning to the first line chart, In 1920, about 40% of houses had a washing machine followed by vaccum cleaner at almost 30%. Although in the opening year no residence had refrigerators, this figure exhibited a rapid growth to reach a peak in 1980 and stayed contant afterward. Vaccum cleaner also became a very common appliance in the given period as it siginificantly rose to 100% in 2000. In the last ten years every accommodation of the country had a vaccum cleaner and a refrigerator. Inspite of a gradual growth to 70% till 1960, the numbers for washing machine stayed under 75% untill 2019.
A glance at the second line chart reveals that, In 1920, the number of housework per week in each residence was the highest at 50% . However, these trend declined drastically to about 10% in 1980, and remained stable over the given time except a little dip in 2019.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...in each residence was the highest at 50% . However, these trend declined drastical...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96832579186 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73894617517 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0100998509 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147764495866 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587195578918 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543858514283 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978102957634 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648177274717 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.