The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
This report derives from the presented bar chart comparing the changes of expenditure on five specific categories of recreation over a time period of five years in three particular countries.
Generally speaking, the spending on these leisure from increased in five years while the USA accounted for the highest spending and Asia for the lowest.
In 1995, the pay-out of Asia in these sectors was at 67 billion dollar which is almost one -third of the United States expenditure with 184 billion dollars. Moreover, the lay-out the Europeans was just under 100. Although publication costing was the major source for the USA and Asia, in Europe it was TV.
On the other hand, In 2000, the spending figure of the Asians and the Europeans saw an gradual increase. the figures of the Asia, and Europe had risen by almost 34% and 37% respectively. In terms of the United States the numbers surged in a dramatic motion and generated a gap of 73% in the definite years time. In all cases, TV and publications were the most invested sectors. followed by music as third entertainment source.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ure of the Asians and the Europeans saw an gradual increase. the figures of the As...
^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... the Europeans saw an gradual increase. the figures of the Asia, and Europe had ris...
^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Followed
...cations were the most invested sectors. followed by music as third entertainment source....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, third, while, in all cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89189189189 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62056819181 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4198194624 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113669813222 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039081892679 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412942059646 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702202349171 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449000593243 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.