To be labelled a ‘Work of Art’, a painting, sculpture or other art form should display certain qualities that are unique. However, over the past century there has been a decline in the quality of prize-winning artwork and it is now possible for quite ordinary pieces of art to be labelled ‘masterpieces ’ whilst true works of art pass unnoticed.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
To be tagged a creation as a " Work of Art" is one of the most prestigious honor for any artist since it requires certain qualities and uniqueness. Many argues that there is a decline in standards of prize-winning creations which started in previous decades. This essay agrees with this argument, since there is a dip in the judgement levels compared to the previous as well as the technological advancements made art less appealing to the current generation.
In the history of mankind, the artwork was always a subject that was closely related. An artist represents his imagination in front our eyes through his artworks. Moreover, in this globalized era, various artwork competitions are mostly related to financial gains. Hence, fair numbers of these contest invite popular film stars, singers, or even political figures as a judge so that they can attract more media coverage. As a result, the evaluation of these creative works provide faulty results and true artistic works go without recognition. To cite an example, an article in "Dhaka Times" disclosed that about 40% of artistic contest in the last decade had a judge who offers a little knowledge about the field.
On the other hand, In this technology-driven world, art has become a field with less concern. For example, In the previous time a portrait was very valuable as it was rare and hard to establish. Nowadays various softwares such as "Adobe Illustrator" can easily generate spectacular portraits just by using photos. Furthermore, the major portion of the young generation choose to work with these software avoiding classical methods of paintings or sculpture. Thus, the quality is on a decline with low participation.
In a nutshell, the stunning quality of previous artwork like "Monalisa", etc are rare today. The lack of proper evaluation and draining participation of the youth in these sectors are the root causes of this phenomenon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
To be tagged a creation as a ' Work of Art' is one of the ...
^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this software' or 'these softwares'?
Suggestion: this software; these softwares
...he young generation choose to work with these software avoiding classical methods of paintings...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s on a decline with low participation. In a nutshell, the stunning quality of p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27156549521 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15822089729 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619808306709 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2968979106 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146964736246 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047635348269 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503186935765 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907848711759 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053402189472 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.