The Chart Below Shows What Anthropology Graduates From One University Did After Finishing Their Undergraduate Degree Course
The pie chart given illustrates the proportion of different kinds of work of students graduating from Anthropology in a particular university and the table compares the amount of money that the anthropologists earn after 5 years.
Overall, the majority of anthropology graduates work as a fulltime employee. It is also clear that the proportion of those who work at government sector having more than 100 000 usd is the highest in comparision with other types of employment.
It can be observed that in the pie chart, there are 52% of graduates working full-time. Then, the figures for those who work part-time job is a little bit smaller, at 15%. This university witness the fact that there are 12% of graduate being in unemployment. When it comes to graduates who pursue postgrad study, the figure for part-time work is lower than that of full-time work, at 5 and 8% respectively. However, there are 8% of the graduates who have no information of employment status.
In terms of salaries after 5 years graduating, there are 5% freelancer consultants and government sector earning 25 to 49, 15% earning 50 to 75. While 40% is the figure for the freelancer consultants who earn 75 to 99 or more than 50, there is only 30% employee in government sector getting 75 to 99. The figures for employees in private sector have relatively similar.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment sector having more than 100 000 usd is the highest in comparision with othe...
^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... usd is the highest in comparision with other types of employment. It can be ob...
^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...s for those who work part-time job is a little bit smaller, at 15%. This university witnes...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'witnesses'.
Suggestion: witnesses
...le bit smaller, at 15%. This university witness the fact that there are 12% of graduate...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97172993797 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55701754386 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8602324396 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.454545455 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113418028284 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536222893121 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588491742827 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834878316373 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067006208126 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.