It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.
To what extent to you agree or disagree?
Local history and world history
Some individuals argue that local history plays more important role than world history in studying programs in schools. However, I believe that both kinds of history do wonders for students knowledge acquisition.
On the one hand, the history in local area can equip children with wide sources of information. First of all, through learning local history, they can understand not only contemporary but also lifestyle in the past. They can dig deeper in local cultures and traditions. For example, the lessons provided by history teachers in schools enable children evidences to explain the way people act and behave with each other. Furthermore, through learning local history, schools can raise the patriotism of students in their early ages. Each history book is composed by various historical experts before given to children and tend to provide summaries about victories of our ancestors battling against the enemies. This is a positive effect on children conscious about their own countries.
On the one hand, studying international history also exerts important impacts on children cognitive. Firstly, the way children imprinting the names of unfamiliar historical figures and specific dates helps the children train their brain. Thus, they can study better in other subjects. For example, the children who are good at remembering foreign names are regarded as being better at learning foreign languages and literature. Moreover, children can broaden their knowledge in cultures all over the world that allow them to integrate well if they have plan to study and work overseas.
In conclusion, I do believe that schools should offer both local history and world history in their courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'planned'.
Suggestion: planned
...low them to integrate well if they have plan to study and work overseas. In conclus...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44074074074 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63432288539 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3317856822 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299752959571 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101360701051 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106532294632 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252920961978 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129457983229 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.