Many people argue that teaching small youngsters about history events occurring in their local regions is more crucial than educating them about the global past affairs. While there are some benefits to teaching world history at schools, I maintain that it would be better for young students to acknowledge their hometown's history.
On the one hand, the idea of acquiring information about international history in school is beneficial to some extent. The main reason is that the acquisition of historical knowledge about the origin and development of the world will give students more insights and valuable lessons from the successes and failures of other nations worldwide during the period of founding and protecting their countries from outside enemies. For example, children can learn about discrepant stages of the global evolution from the industrial era to the modern-day era of ever-advancing technology. As a result, this useful information will help them to broaden their horizons about their surrounding world.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why minor youngsters should learn about their local history. First and foremost, learning about historical events happening in their hometowns will make them feel more responsible for the flourishing of their local areas in the future. This is because they learn that their peaceful life nowadays costs millions of lives of their ancestors, therefore, they would treasure more every land of their hometowns and desire to make them become more and more prosperous.Secondly, young students could also learn a number of meaningful lessons from their forefathers, thus, they can use this knowledge to avoid the same mistakes and have a more potent personal development in the long run.
In conclusion, it seems evident that obtaining both world and local historical information has its own unique advantage, but I contend that it would be a better option for school children to inform more about their local history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Secondly
...ke them become more and more prosperous.Secondly, young students could also learn a numb...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36942675159 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79453109351 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525477707006 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.14709182 49.4020404114 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.6 106.682146367 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256714410969 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11932051604 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448919462662 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174775524449 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370549987048 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.