The first line chart illustrates the amount of money spent on children’s sports by parents in Britain during the period from 2008 to 2014. The latter line graph gives data for the quantity of children taking part in football, athletics and swimming recorded concurrently.
Overall, there was an upward trend in either parental expenditure on sports played by children or the number of minor youngsters engaging in sporting activities. In addition, football was significantly more popular than athletics and swimming.
In 2008, the monthly budget for children’s sports stood at 20 pounds. Afterward, a gradual growth to approximately 32 pounds was witnessed in the amount of money spent on sports for children per month.
Regarding the number of children taking part in sports, in 2008, the quantity of young football players was about 8 million children, followed by the figures for swimming and athletics at roughly 2 million and less than 1 million children, respectively. Over a 6-year period, the number of children playing football climbed slightly to 9.5 million children.By contrast, participation in swimming almost doubled to nearly 4 million children, and there was a near fivefold increase in the number of children doing athletics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 357, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...limbed slightly to 9.5 million children.By contrast, participation in swimming alm...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he number of children doing athletics.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41326530612 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91784550065 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3330110347 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.625 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348914120049 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164392886733 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115838595152 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213008787697 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674776703192 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.