It is true that the gap between affluent and impoverished members of society has increasingly widened. The unequal living standard is the principal problem associated with this phenomenon and several measures could be taken by the government and rich individuals to tackle the issues.
To commence with, the imbalance in standard of living of the poor and rich is the fundamental problem resulting from the wider gap in terms of material possessions in this modern world. While wealthy individuals are living in an adequate condition with all essential necessities, those who are living in poverty need to struggle everyday to earn a living and take care of their offspring. This can be clearly seen in many slums where people do not have sufficient food or clothes and they have to live in extremely poor conditions.Wealthy city citizens,on the other hand, have an extravagant life and can purchase any luxurious items they desire.
Fortunately, a number of potent approaches can be made by the government and rich people to combat these issues. The first solution is that the government should provide better social welfare for poverty-stricken residents and create more job opportunities with a stable salary to give a hand to unemployed poor people to make ends meet. Moreover, they can also offer impoverished people free training courses of several manual jobs with a view to enhance the work productivity and safety for workers. In addition, wealthy members of the community can also contribute to help the poorer people escape from the poverty trap and improve the quality of their lives by donating money to voluntary charities assisting the underprivileged groups of people.
In conclusion, the inequality in the quality of life of wealthy and impoverished citizens is the main problem that emerged from this development. Consequently, a joint effort of both the government and richer people could address the aforementioned issue. In my view,it is impossible to completely get rid of the gap between two classes of people in society. However, I contend that as long as each individual feels satisfied and content with their lives, this gap is no longer a huge problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... are living in poverty need to struggle everyday to earn a living and take care of their...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Wealthy
...ve to live in extremely poor conditions.Wealthy city citizens,on the other hand, have a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , on
...ly poor conditions.Wealthy city citizens,on the other hand, have an extravagant lif...
^^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rchase any luxurious items they desire. Fortunately, a number of potent approach...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dition, wealthy members of the community can also contribute to help the poorer p...
^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ess the aforementioned issue. In my view,it is impossible to completely get rid of ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this gap is no longer a huge problem.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24011299435 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99955974724 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564971751412 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8009548058 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.692307692 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2307692308 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315646485877 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110119982865 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575430367693 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185338155786 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298257813881 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.