Many people argue that the opportunity to attend tertiary education is equal for every individual and it is advisable for the government to provide free education for all students irrespective of their financial capacity. While this suggestion will be beneficial for students coming from low-income families and the society as a whole, I maintain that it will put a heavier burden on the national budget and negatively affect students' attitudes towards studying.
On the one hand, the idea of supplying free higher education is reasonable to some extent. First and foremost, an exemption to tuition fees means that people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds can have a chance to pursue university. As the price of taking a course at university is relatively costly nowadays, many impoverished students can not afford these costs and they have to drop out of schools to begin their working life. Therefore, with the financial support from the government, these students can continue their studying and secure a number of well-paid jobs after graduating from university. Moreover, at the state level, society will benefit from a higher level of civilized citizens. Since everyone is offered free pedagogy from the government, the intellectual level of people also improves considerably.
On the other hand, there are a number of reasons why the provision of free university’s fees will have a negative influence on the state budget and students’ learning attitude. The first reason is that in order to supply education without charge for every individual, it requires a huge amount of money. As a result, it will put a strain on the national fund and a variety of essential aspects that are in need of government’s investment will be delayed. The second reason involves the degradation in students’ determination towards their studying. This is because it costs students nothing to retake a failed subject at university; they will take it for granted and do not pay attention to academic outcomes. Consequently, this will lead to the decline in the quality of tertiary education.
In conclusion, although the exemption of university learning costs regardless of students’ financial conditions will do wonders for disadvantaged students as well as facilitate a more civilized community, I contend that the problems resulting from this phenomenon should also not be ignored. In my view, it is a better option for the government to have a policy to financially support university students according to their financial circumstances.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35910224439 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0758715739 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508728179551 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2691016168 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.3125 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0625 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245814407993 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819194651118 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614581494052 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160937472715 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031419963202 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.