It is true that there has been a transformation in the approach of individuals accessing and acquiring information since the emergence of the internet. Several previously unseen problems have resulted from this tendency and they should be tackled by a number of effective solutions from the government.
As getting information via the internet is increasingly popular than ever before, several related problems can be anticipated. The main issue is that the possibility of updating online fake news is significantly higher than that of traditional printed newspapers. This is due to the fact that the credibility of information is unknown, thus, most of the pieces of information on the news websites having unclear origins are unreliable and not trustworthy. For instance, a few months ago, there were some Youtube videos that attracted a large number of people concerned ,claiming that North Korean leader Mr Kim had died, but in reality,he is still alive. Another problem is hacking, phishing and identity theft are caused by the internet and in many cases, they have devastating consequences.
However, I believe that stricter legislation relevant to online publicity and higher virtual security can mitigate the frequency of online issues. Firstly, the government should pay more attention to the supervision and scrutiny of published online news before accepting them, thereby taking prompt actions to preclude the existence of untrue sources of information and ensure more reliable official news on online platforms. Moreover, cyber police should constantly keep track of any issues related to cyber stealing information and must perform swift investigations and take concrete steps to discontinue such wrongdoing.
In conclusion, while getting and obtaining information through the internet is risky with a range of unreliable information as well as the likelihood of being hacked or stolen personal information, these can be combated with the introduction of sterner law in terms of online usages and the enhancement in better cyber safety.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...were some Youtube videos that attracted a large number of people concerned ,claiming that North K...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...acted a large number of people concerned ,claiming that North Korean leader Mr Kim...
^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , he
...n leader Mr Kim had died, but in reality,he is still alive. Another problem is hack...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in many cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54920634921 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02830520277 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0267520257 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.909090909 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7272727273 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186292293989 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678534846034 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535812463431 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110074247259 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352793723568 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.