It is true that the gap between affluent and impoverished members of society has increasingly widened. There are a number of problems associated with this phenomenon and several measures could be taken by the government and rich individuals to tackle the issues.
To commence with, the imbalance in standard of living of the poor and rich is the fundamental problem resulting from the wider gap in terms of material possessions in this modern world. While wealthy individuals are living in an adequate condition with all essential necessities, those who are living in poverty need to struggle everyday to earn a living and take care of their offspring. This can be clearly seen in many slums where people do not have sufficient food or clothes and they have to live in extremely poor conditions.Wealthy city citizens,on the other hand, have an extravagant life and can purchase any luxurious items they desire. Furthermore, an increasing distance in gap between rich and poor individuals could lead to severe discrimination. As people have a stereotype that they should look up to affluent individuals, whereas the poor ones are not highly appreciated and considered to have no voice in the society.
Fortunately, a number of potent approaches can be made by the government and rich people to combat these issues. The first solution is that the government should provide better social welfare for poverty-stricken residents and create more job opportunities with a stable salary to give a hand to unemployed poor people to make ends meet. Moreover, they can also offer impoverished people free training courses of several manual jobs with a view to enhance the work productivity and safety for workers. In addition, wealthy members of the community can also contribute to help the poorer people escape from the poverty trap and improve the quality of their lives by donating money to voluntary charities assisting the underprivileged groups of people.
In conclusion, the inequality in the quality of life and ways of treating the wealthy and impoverished citizens are the two main problems that emerged from this development. Therefore, a joint effort of both the government and richer people could address the aforementioned issues. In my view,it is impossible to completely get rid of the gap between two classes of people in society. However, I contend that as long as each individual feels satisfied and content with their lives, this gap is no longer a huge problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... are living in poverty need to struggle everyday to earn a living and take care of their...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Wealthy
...ve to live in extremely poor conditions.Wealthy city citizens,on the other hand, have a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , on
...ly poor conditions.Wealthy city citizens,on the other hand, have an extravagant lif...
^^^
Line 3, column 938, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idered to have no voice in the society. Fortunately, a number of potent approach...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dition, wealthy members of the community can also contribute to help the poorer p...
^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ss the aforementioned issues. In my view,it is impossible to completely get rid of ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this gap is no longer a huge problem.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17369727047 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02154805712 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7982501886 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337079604627 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113524083547 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561968196936 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199259306257 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213500092684 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.