The provided line graph illustrates the export of coffee from three distinct nations during a 10-year period, starting in 2002.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the output of coffee in all nations over the examined years. Additionally, the figure for Brazil’s exported coffee witnessed the most significant rate of increase among three countries and ranked first by the end of the period.
In particular, in 2002, the amount of coffee exported from Costa Rica stood at 15 million kilograms, followed closely by that of Brazil with about 12 million kilograms registered concurrently. However, in the next four years, the figure for Costa Rica’s exported coffee underwent a dramatic decrease to hit the lowest point of 7 million kilograms prior to a considerable rebound to 20 million kilograms in 2012.
Regarding the figure for Columbia, there were some fluctuations in the output of coffee exported between 2 million kilograms( in 2008) and 12 million kilograms (in 2006) from 2002 to 2008. Afterward, the figure for Colombia’s coffee export experienced a sharp climb to 15 million kilograms in 2012. Meanwhile,the figure for Brazil witnessed a substantial growth to 25 million kilograms of exported coffee by the end of the period.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bound to 20 million kilograms in 2012. Regarding the figure for Columbia, there...
^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... 15 million kilograms in 2012. Meanwhile,the figure for Brazil witnessed a substanti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.245 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86827038474 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5260332996 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.125 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186821603324 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995090154968 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538650881658 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136572492012 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489635352507 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bound to 20 million kilograms in 2012. Regarding the figure for Columbia, there...
^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... 15 million kilograms in 2012. Meanwhile,the figure for Brazil witnessed a substanti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.245 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86827038474 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5260332996 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.125 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186821603324 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995090154968 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538650881658 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136572492012 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489635352507 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.