Many people argue that there are several discrepant qualifications between males and females. Therefore, some occupations are compatible with men while others are suitable for women. While there are some benefits for males and females to occupy the positions which suit them most regarding their distinct traits, I maintain that people can do every type of job they desire irrespective of their gender.
On the one hand, the belief in gender-specific career pursuits is reasonable to some extent. First and foremost, it is true that men tend to be physically stronger than females owing to their typical biological features. Therefore, they are often responsible for undertaking heavy-lifting occupations such as builders or mechanicians. Women, meanwhile, are assumed to be better at tasks that require less strength such as household chores or office work. Moreover, women are commonly believed to be good at comprehending language, social studies, and art-related subjects while men are inclined to have a knack for mathematics and other scientific subjects. For example, in Vietnam, around 76% of employees working in the pedagogical sector are women whereas the figure for men working in scientific fields constitutes up to 67% of the total workforce.
On the other hand, I contend that gender should not be the prerequisite element to determine an appropriate profession for an individual. The fundamental reason is that each person has their own personal preferences; thus, they are the only ones who can make a decision on the most suitable career path for themselves. For instance, there is no limitation for a boy relishing fashion to become a fashion designer or a girl having an interest in science to become a scientist. As a result, it depends on each individual's fascination to decide which is the most compatible job for them regardless of their sex.
In conclusion, although the difference in specific features of the two genders will partly influence people’s choices of employment, I maintain that individual preferences play the most significant role in choosing the most suitable jobs for each person.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...entist. As a result, it depends on each individuals fascination to decide which is the most...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35608308605 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04872713114 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590504451039 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2688689317 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.928571429 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323351182316 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103799150807 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794791095328 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189393281264 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639005407436 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...entist. As a result, it depends on each individuals fascination to decide which is the most...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35608308605 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04872713114 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590504451039 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2688689317 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.928571429 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323351182316 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103799150807 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794791095328 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189393281264 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639005407436 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.