Many people argue that it is necessary for elementary youngsters to acquire the basic knowledge about cultivation and animal husbandry. While there are some benefits to acknowledging the way to plant vegetables and raise animals at a young age, I maintain that the demerits of being more prone to contagious ailments and physical injuries would be more dominant than the merits.
On the one hand, the idea of educating young children about growing vegetables and raising animals is beneficial to some extent. First and foremost, these activities play an integral role in encouraging students to participate in physical exercises. As they need to sow the seeds and water the plants on a regular basis until they are full-grown, which demand great physicality to accomplish. Moreover, these practices also equip minors with a basic foundation of agricultural knowledge. Therefore, in the future, they can make use of these farming implications on their own gardens as well as pass down to their offspring.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why learning how to cultivate plants and bring up animals is harmful to young children. The first reason is that children would be more susceptible to infectious diseases from animals. This is due to the fact that the immune system of children is insufficiently developed so they are easily exposed to viruses and bacteria from domestic animals such as dogs or cats. Another reason is that schoolchildren can injure themselves by farming tools while gardening. As a result, many people claim that performing these activities at schools would have adverse impacts on their children’s physical conditions.
In conclusion, while some maintain that planting vegetables and raising animals will facilitate more outside activities and better knowledge about agriculture for children, I contend that the exposure to communicable illnesses and accidents during gardening should not be ignored.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41176470588 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93093350739 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591503267974 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8432966275 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.384615385 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141104721883 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488219569263 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529788322102 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857110511828 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308250359944 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.