Many people argue that an increase in petrol prices for cars and other transport by the government would address several problems of the environment. While this idea could help reduce the amount of harmful fumes, I maintain that a global awareness campaign is a much more feasible option.
On the one hand, this policy might help cut down on the emission from private vehicles which pollutes the air in big cities. Indeed, as the cost per kilometer increases, people will have to consider reducing the distance and the frequency of traveling. If there is a need to travel commuters might turn to greener and more cost-efficient means of transportations such as mass transit or electricity vehicles. In both of these cases, the total amount of exhaust fumes that cause air pollution is limited.
However, a raise in fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the perplexing environmental issues. In fact, causes of pollution are diverse, involving the use of plastic bags in shopping or chemicals in both agriculture and industry which contaminate both land and water bodies.Therefore, I contend that a worldwide campaign which raise individuals’ awareness about the detrimental consequences of their shopping habits and presses companies to curtail the consumption of notorious chemicals and resolve to greener cultivating and manufacturing methods will effectively alleviate these problems.
In conclusion, while raising petrol costs can partly combat the environmental problems by discouraging the usage of private vehicles, the ideal solution should be making the public and enterprises aware of these issues. I am also convinced that once more actions are taken, humans can reverse the effects of problems related to the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... contaminate both land and water bodies.Therefore, I contend that a worldwide campaign wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39051094891 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04471664197 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624087591241 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.229368982 49.4020404114 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.7 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194346889049 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745986502795 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890928075925 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110348529903 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617169842486 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.