Many people argue that sharing a huge amount of knowledge in terms of science, business and academic areas is beneficial, while others claim that information that is extremely crucial and precious should not be publicized. The following essay will provide several merits of both views before stating my personal perspective in the conclusion.
On the one hand, the idea of updating all kinds of knowledge about scientific, commercial and academic sectors is reasonable to some extent. First and foremost, everyone can acquire information about almost every aspect of life and utilize them in their real life. For instance, a farmer can make use of the agricultural knowledge they have learned from a video on Youtube to have more efficient farming practices to improve the productivity of their plants. Furthermore, the availability of sufficient information in various fields can provide students with useful data for their research and school assignments.As a result, this will be a helpful tool for students to ameliorate their comprehension about certain subjects.
On the other hand, the argument against making too vital and useful information accessible widely could be explained by the following reason. The fundamental justification is that there are a number of integral pieces of information that only professional people are allowed to know to preserve their confidentiality. Take the production of nuclear weapons as a prime example. The detailed knowledge related to this hazardous weapon should be acknowledged by only expert scientists and governments to ensure human safety and national security. Consequently, it is essential for this integral information to be under control.
In conclusion, although the publication of knowledge in a wide range of fields may do wonders for individuals to have easier access to knowledge and practical usages in their daily lives , I contend that the vitally important and beneficial data serving for confidential purposes should not be shared widely in the community. In my view, it is advisable for the publishers to carefully scrutinize any information before broadcasting publicly to ensure the preservation of secrecy of some data.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ersonal perspective in the conclusion. On the one hand, the idea of updating al...
^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wledge they have learned from a video on Youtube to have more efficient farming p...
^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...r their research and school assignments.As a result, this will be a helpful tool f...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...comprehension about certain subjects. On the other hand, the argument against ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egral information to be under control. In conclusion, although the publication ...
^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nd practical usages in their daily lives , I contend that the vitally important an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52071005917 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1181015434 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591715976331 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8794397135 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.538461538 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192283001732 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668797504374 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504356513852 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119975896483 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380306585742 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.