It is true that people now can reply to both work and personal calls via cell phones at any time. While there are some benefits to answering phones at any period, I maintain that this tendency negatively influences both individuals and the public as a whole.
On the one hand, the idea of responding to calls related to work and personal matters under any circumstance is beneficial to some extent. First and foremost, the ability to answer phones at any time can enhance work efficiency considerably. As whenever receiving phone calls relevant to work from employers,employees can accomplish their given tasks immediately, therefore, they can meet the deadlines in time without any procrastination. Moreover, people nowadays can update the latest information about their families or friends by communicating through smart phones 24/7. Specifically, it is greatly beneficial in emergency cases when they receive calls about serious problems related to their loved ones, thereby, they can make any prompt actions to deal with the problems. Therefore, these phone calls can help people to acquire the up-to-date issues occuring surrounding them on a daily basis.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why the prevalence of calls about work and personal issues can have adverse impacts on the receivers and the community. The first reason is that these calls can cause excessive nuisance for the workers, especially when they are enjoying their leisure time after extensive hours of working. As a result, the unguaranteed work-life balance would lead to lower job satisfaction among employees. Furthermore, the development is also attributed to the loss of a sense of community. In lieu of chatting face-to-face, people are inclined to contact each other by phones and isolate them from real life due to the convenience and flexibility of smartphones.
In conclusion, while the capacity of answering work and personal calls at any time helps promote higher work productivity in the workplace and keep abreast of the current affairs happening in people’s daily lives, I contend that the imbalance between work and personal life as well as the poorer social connection should not be ignored. In my opinion, the detrimental consequences of this phenomenon overwhelm the aforementioned merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , employees
...ne calls relevant to work from employers,employees can accomplish their given tasks immedi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 902, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring surrounding them on a daily basis. On the other hand, there are a variety o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ocial connection should not be ignored. In my opinion, the detrimental consequence...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3698630137 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01977469679 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558904109589 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7343412445 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336052622506 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114325021283 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818548404791 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220668473001 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092405284494 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.