Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Is this development positive or negative for both individuals and society? Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is true that the prevalence of advanced technologies, especially the advent of cell phones, has transformed human life profoundly. Nowadays, while many people are inclined to take advantage of telephones to reply work or make personal phone calls day around, I hold a conviction that it is a both positive and negative trend.
On the one hand, people can reap several considerable benefits from this phenomenon. As to humanity, with the help of this handset device people can and interact with their beloved in a far-flung place regardless of the geographical barrier. By doing this, individuals can strengthen their relationship with acquaintances or relatives as well as contribute to creating a close-knit community in the virtual world. In addition, cell phones enable people to boost their productivity, especially in case some pop-up problems arise when they are not in the workplace. Smart phone can check the email or do video conferencing so that they can deal with these troubles instantaneously. Finally, telcos in particular and the society in general can make huge profit from the charges users pay for 3G services or telecommunication services.
On the other hand, there are still some potential drawbacks when human beings increase their dependence on telephones day around. Firstly, the overuse of cell phones to give other people a ring give rise to the lack of social relations. For example, instead of making an appointment and meet friends or clients in person, using telephones makes people loose the chance to form a strong bond in their relationships. Moreover, considering medical issues, that people make their eye glued to this technological gadget all day can give rise to hidden damage to human’s health, such as tumor growth, attention disorder or short-sightedness, by virtue of its radio-frequency radiation emission.
In conclusion, although telephones cause some problems to users, it seems to be that the benefits of these technical gadgets are still undeniable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39747634069 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15351401745 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611987381703 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1385872212 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.615384615 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.3076923077 7.06120827912 217% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187152760333 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620418817789 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492577002336 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101396256216 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498996999678 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.